In her book The Next Day: Transitions, Change, and Moving Forward, Melinda French Gates reveals what led her to divorce Bill Gates, but this book is not intended to feed the gossip mills. Gates explores her life lessons arising from several times of transition, in her life.
Melinda Gates does not travel a superficial path. She may be religious, but in this book her journey is more spiritual. She acknowledges her feelings, analyzes her deepest fears, and conquers obstacles.
Leaving a supportive, loving family to go to college at Duke in North Carolina she encountered homesickness, loneliness, doubt, and academic difficulties but she stayed at Duke. Sometimes she found solace in books or poetry. She joined a sorority and made new friends. What she went through is not unusual. Many freshmen make this adjustment. But she knew that it would change her life if she left school. She even went on to earn an MBA at Duke. Her father saw her as a scientist and mathematician, giving her the confidence to compete in tech fields mostly pursued by men.
A second key moment Gates describes came at the birth of her first child, Jennifer Katharine Gates. An earthquake brought this realization:
“My new world spun on a new axis, with Jenn at its center, I realized I would have died for her that night. I would have sacrificed Bill for her in an instant. I would have given my own mother’s life to save Jenn’s.” (p. 32)
She continues to talk about parenting:
“Eventually, I found that framework in the concept of the “good enough” parent. The concept traces back to a British psychologist named Donald Winnicott, who coined the phrase in the 1950s… (p. 42)
and
“Most of all, we need the discipline to separate our own needs from our children’s and the wisdom to know when to let go. (p. 35)
Bill and Melinda had a close bond with another couple, Emily and John. When John dies of cancer, Melinda goes through all that comes with a great loss. She describes how she goes on with her life, and how she supports Emily in her grief.
The moment Melinda understands that her gut is telling her that she needs to divorce Bill and pursue her own goals almost sends her world almost out of control. She finds a therapist, after much self-reflection who helps her find her way to her next day.
All these transitions are difficult, but even more so when your life is so public. Melinda wants to put her considerable gifts to work helping women around the globe achieve their own goals. Considering the challenges to women’s rights, even in supposedly enlightened nations, we can only applaud her present and future contributions on behalf of women.
Melinda French Gates is an authentic person, as reflected in her book The Next Day. Her experiences are not so different from those of all women. Even so, her book is inspirational and aspirational because of the courage and clarity with which she faces each challenge.
In the Steve Jobs biography by Walter Isaacson, the author puts Jobs in a class with Einstein and Leonardo Da Vinci because Issacson also wrote about those great men. Was Steve Jobs a great man? He was certainly complicated. He loved perfection in design, but he knew that he was not perfect. Some people in Jobs’ life believed that the fact that he was adopted may have been at the bottom of some aspects of his personality. The author uses the adjectives “abandoned – chosen – special” to sum up the emotional impacts Jobs experienced as he wrestled with being given away by his actual parents. In fact, Jobs refused to meet his birth father.
Steve had a daughter, Lisa, when he was very young, and he did not see her for years although he later tried to include her in his life. He also had a half-sister, Mona Simpson, a novelist. He did not have an easy-going personality, in fact he could be cutting and cruel, but he also had access to considerable charm. He raged at employees and suppliers, he sometimes cried when he was frustrated, and he had very bizarre eating habits (lots of fasting, mostly vegetarian or vegan). There were, however, saving graces.
He visited Japan and was very taken with the spareness and spirituality of Japanese design, and all things Japanese. He grew up with Bob Dylan, the Beatles, the Rolling Stones and many more rock stars, eventually meeting most of them. He had an interest in Eastern religion and philosophy, as many famous figures did in the 1960s and 70s.
Steve Jobs is the myth. Jobs did drop out of school to tinker with computers in his parent’s garage for a while (with friends). He envisioned a future for computers, a future where everyone had a computer of his/her own. The computers he wanted to design had to have that same spareness he loved in Japanese culture, but he wanted these computers to be proprietary machines, not sharing hardware or software with Microsoft computers or any of the other companies that were racing to produce popular computers. He was fired by his own company and went off unsuccessfully on his own to create other brands but when Apple was in trouble he went back to the company, and he stayed. Although Jobs eventually agreed to allow Apple computers to use Microsoft Office, it was a tough compromise for this purist.
Find out how Jobs named Apple. Find out how Jobs got involved with Disney and Pixar. Isaacson’s book is very readable and detailed. Find out how and when he met his wife Laurene Powell and about the family they made. Jobs loved to make deals during walks with suppliers and creators who interested him. Many deals were hammered out on these long walks. The weather in California colluded with him on this. Bill Gates, with his completely different personality, showed up in Jobs’ life from time to time. They were rivals, but Gates was not as mercurial as Jobs. They didn’t collaborate much, but they were contemporaries in a field that was exploding with innovation.
Find out how Jobs made his very seductive ads, how he imagined the iPod, iPad, iCloud, and iTunes. Jobs made each roll out of an Apple product into a ‘magical mystery tour.” He kept new products shrouded in mystery until the magical reveal. He was not only a great product designer; he was an expert at marketing.
It’s a very good book about a very interesting person and his too short life. It is a long book but spending all that time with Jobs and his A team, his family, his temperament, and his amazingly creative mind is time well spent. Unlike Einstein and Da Vinci, Steve Jobs lived in some of the same decades we have lived in. He is not a historical figure. He is a contemporary and we forgive him his bad behavior because his creative genius inspires us to believe that even flawed humans can accomplish great things.
Walter Isaacson is one of our quintessential biographers. He gives us the real Steve Jobs, if that is possible to do in a biography. Credit is due to Steve Jobs also for allowing Isaacson to depict him honestly.
My best friend married a Jewish man who became a good friend to all of us. He was trying to learn Yiddish for a while, so when I saw this book on Amazon called Speaking Yiddish to Chickens by Seth Stern, I decided to read it and to get my friend a copy of the book. I thought it might be humorous or full of lost Yiddish words, but this did not turn out to be the case. That is not to say that it wasn’t fascinating. I did not know that Jewish refugees from Europe after World War II often found life in NYC or other urban places too crowded and, after all their trials, too chaotic. They longed for peace and a way to remake their shattered lives.
The Jewish Agricultural Society (JAS) suggested to some refugees that chicken farming in southern New Jersey was becoming a popular lifestyle choice for refugees. The book is centered around two Grine (Grin-ah) (the category used to describe postwar Jewish refugees) named Nuchim (New-kim) and Bronia (Bron-yah) Green who decide to buy a south Jersey chicken farm in a place called Vineland. These two are the author’s grandparents and he talked with them many times while writing this book. Their daughter, Ruth Green, married a Stern. The author is Ruth’s son.
Both Nuchim and Bronia spent a part of the war in a forest in Germany as underground fighters and to hide from deportation to a concentration camp. When Bronia got to the US she weighed only 80 pounds. Deprivation was a common denominator for Jewish people who survived. They decided to buy a farm with another couple, the Liverants. Both couples had one child, both girls.
I bought a copy of the book on Audible so I could hear the correct pronunciation of all those Yiddish words that weren’t there, but it was still a good story to listen to.
As we follow Seth Stern’s grandparents through the years when they pursued chicken farming, and as the children in the community got older, we see the family more involved in a community of people, eventually enjoying trips to a nearby beach, playing cards, and enjoying other social occasions. By this time Bronia and Nuchim have their own farm.
However, chicken farming is hard work. Chickens can’t get too cold, especially baby chicks. Chickens must be fed every few hours. The eggs must be washed and dried by hand, then candled to make sure they meet government regulations. There were few hours for playing, at least until people started inventing automatic feeders, egg dryers, and ways to candle eggs without handling each one separately. The economic security of chicken farmers was very dependent on the market price for eggs, and this price varied from season to season and year to year. No one was getting rich.
The author interviewed the children (his mother and her contemporaries) asking about what life on the farm was like and about how they were treated in school. They told him that they had been subjected to plenty of antisemitism in public schools. He interviewed the parents to find out how they were dealing with the terrible things that happened to them in the war. Many parents did not want to ever talk about what they had experienced. Others were very vocal about the abuses they endured.
I’m very glad I read this book. Here is a little corner of American Jewish life that I knew nothing about. There are many more such corners to explore but not all are documented in books. Speaking Yiddish to Chickens is a true nonfiction book with an index and bibliography. Because it focuses on two people related to the author and expands outward from there, it is not overly academic and is very readable.
Anne Applebaum’s book has a subtitle, The Dictators Who Want to Run the World. From her perch in Poland, she has a nearer view of all the players, Russia, China, Syria, Iran, and Africa. Nations that are run by autocrats are using new technologies not only to spy on other countries (especially democracies) but also to spy on their own citizens. You might argue that nations need to know what their enemies, both foreign and domestic, are up to but there are more sinister motives at work here too. Chapter 3 in Autocracy, Inc. has the title, “Controlling the Narrative”.
The author begins by reminding Americans that our NSA is collecting data about US citizens as we were informed by Edward Snowden, a whistleblower or traitor, depending on your point of view, who is living as an exile in Russia. She also mentions Pegasus spyware in Poland which was eventually exposed and investigated.
“If no parallel scandal has ever unfolded in China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea, that’s because there are no legislative committees or free media that could play the same role.” (p. 71)
Applebaum reasons that when democracies use spyware it helps autocracies justify their abuse. If there are fewer objections to using spyware outside of China, then there will be fewer objections to using it inside of China.
In fact, we all expect that surveillance inside nations, even democracies, will escalate as new tech advances are developed. Why develop spyware if you won’t use it. Americans objected to the intrusions of the Patriot Act after the attacks on 9/11 but were so shaken by these brazen attacks on America that we accepted these rules while also believing that they would be temporary. They have been replaced by the USA Freedom Act which curtailed the government’s authority to collect data in 2015. Democrats in Congress strongly objected whenever Trump wanted to collect names of people in a group he wanted to target.
In China, objections can be deadly, as in Tiananmen Square in 1989. China, says Applebaum, first tried to eliminate the activists (people), then set out to eliminate the ideas such as the rule of law, the separation of powers, the right to free speech and the right to assemble which are described as “spiritual pollution”. (p. 66)
While Americans still believe, or say they believe that the internet would lead to a cultural renaissance, Applebaum predicted in 2012 that the internet would become a tool of control. China was designing “the Great Firewall of China” (p. 67) which used an “elaborate system of blocks and filters to prevent users from seeing particular words and tools. She tells us that foreign companies rushed into the new security market in the same way companies had rushed into the post-Soviet financial market. (Yahoo, Microsoft, Cisco Systems all made software that complied with China’s rules.) These companies were eased out once China had access to their software. (p. 68)
The security network was expanded by combining online tracking with tools of repression such as security cameras, police inspections and arrest. Other tools might include “nanny apps” on phones, monitoring book purchases, picking up on unusual behaviors, voice recognition, and even DNA swabs. All these tools have been used on the Uighur population in China. Now add in facial recognition and AI and you have a state that can truly control the narrative.
Anne Applebaum did not just write her book to expose state surveillance tactics. Perhaps she felt we needed to understand what might be coming to a place near you. These systems can be copied and have been copied by many nations including Pakistan, Brazil, Mexico, Serbia, South Africa and Turkey.
“The more China can bring other countries’ models of grievance into line with China’s own,” argues Steven Feldstein, an expert in digital technology, “the less these countries pose a threat to Chinese hegemony.” (Am I nervous about writing these words without a powerful husband such as Applebaum’s to make her a public figure and hard to attack – yes, I am sometimes paranoid.)
Russia plays a different game says Applebaum. Lie constantly and blatantly and when exposed offer no counterarguments. (p. 78) Blame everyone but yourself. This “fire hose of falsehoods” makes citizens question how you can possibly know what really happened and so they avoid politics altogether. Autocrats spread hopelessness and cynicism because it works to their advantage. This is not Russia’s only game. Russia is also a surveillance state.
Surveillance was a thing we worried about in the post-WWII world. We had all read Orwell’s 1984. We expected our freedom to include privacy. After the events of 9/11 we saw the need for some spying, both domestic and foreign, but we still hoped to not invade the homes of private citizens. Now, we are in an age where we live with hacking, with having our data stolen regularly, and with who knows how much surveillance because we can’t imagine our lives without the internet and cell phones.
Many American fully believe that if Trump and the right-wing MAGA’s win in 2024 all aspects of surveillance will be expanded and private citizens may be pursued because of the things they think and what they write or have written. Even without the MAGA’s in power, surveillance will most likely expand given all the autocracies that have cropped up everywhere. We may not be able to keep it focused on only foreign countries. This is one of our great fears of AI that it will be used by our government to control our behavior, regardless of what party you are registered with or the fact that you choose to not belong to a party.
“In seeking to create, these new propagandists, like their leaders, will reach for whatever ideology, whatever technology, and whatever emotions might be useful.”…Only the purpose never changes, Autocracy, Inc. hopes to rewrite the rules of the international system itself.” (p. 97)
Chapter 3 also goes into, in some detail, the changes in print and social media that are accompanying this rise in “spying”. Project 2025 will give MAGA carte blanche to spy on all Americans. Anne Applebaum’s book is a warning. Soon she will offer some remedies.
Let’s see what Anne Applebaum means when she compares the spread of autocracy and kleptocracy to the spread of a cancer. As Western nations try to influence nations that intimidate or use violence against their citizens – nations that give power to a few and squelch the human rights of many – by sanctioning them or their banks or institutions, autocratic leaders are creeping in to bypass these sanctions or boycotts. In a way Autocracy, Inc., if it existed as a formal global entity, would be an anti-NATO. These nations seek to undermine democracies and, if they succeed, they create new autocracies. The pilfering of national dollars can cause the nations they “protect” to fail without their assistance (sometimes even with their assistance). The lure of fortunes to be made and sequestered away is creating a pull towards autocracy in nations that are long-established democracies. This has us fearing that the balance of global power is shifting towards autocratic/kleptocratic governance and may give global hegemony to a giant autocracy like China, or a giant, ruthless autocracy like Russia. The 2024 election in America could weaken our democracy, perhaps beyond restoration, if Trump and the Republicans win.
Applebaum uses several examples to illustrate how Autocracy Inc., through mostly unplanned interventions, allows dysfunctional, pillaged national economies to continue to serve as fodder for kleptocrats. These rescuer nations may have once required no quid pro quos, but they have learned to profit as they preserve autocracies in trouble.
This article will summarize her discussion of this dynamic with one example in Venezuela, but there are more examples in Applebaum’s book. President Hugo Chavez rose to power in 1998. Venezuela was an oil state, “nepotistic and corrupt.” Politicians were bribed and deals were offered to friends of the former President. Chavez ran as a leader “who promised to create a more honest “Bavarian Republic of Venezuela”. But as corruption crept in Chavez did not pursue opportunities to end it, in fact he fired the whistleblower, a member of his inner circle. Chavez, like Putin, chose to turn Venezuela into a kleptocracy. “Corrupt officials prove more malleable than clean ones.” (p. 45)
Chavez eliminated transparency and accountability, he broke democratic institutions like the press, the courts, the civil service. (Sound familiar?) All the while he kept proclaiming his belief in democracy. Applebaum says, “since everyone was breaking the law no one wanted to talk about it.” Meanwhile, officials were hiding millions in oil money in a Portuguese Bank (Banco Espirito Santo). Ten billion dollars went into Swiss banks and 26 billion from a Venezuelan oil company scam was stashed in Andora Banks. A later investigation showed 127 cases of large-scale corruption just in the oil industry. (pg. 46)
A new form of corruption later named currency exchange manipulation offered a way to profit from skimming dollars and exploiting weak laws. For a while students figured out how to game the currency exchange system. It was called the “democratization of kleptocracy” Chavez was able to fool many for a while until the decline of the oil industry began in 2002-3.
“Billions (or maybe tens of billions) of state funds had vanished, the country’s foreign currency had disappeared into private offshore accounts, hyperinflation accelerated and imported goods vanished.” (p. 48-49)
Chavez died in 2013, and Venezuelans hoped the corruption would end when they elected Nicolás Maduro, but, Applebaum contends, “Autocracy Inc. stepped in to help.” Rogue states surviving under sanctions turned to new sources of funding. They turned to drug trafficking, illegal mining, extortion, kidnapping, and gasoline smuggling. She argues, “[i]f a state is a member of Autocracy Inc. there are other options.” (p. 50) There are friends and trading partners in other sanctioned states. There are companies that are unbothered by corruption – happy to encourage it and to participate in it.
Russian companies stepped in to replace North America, South America, and Europe. Rosneft, Gazprom, Lukoil, TNK-BP all put money into Venezuela. Grain imports from the US and Canada were replaced by Russia along with 4 billion in Russian weapons.
China started loaning money to Venezuela without conditions which bought Chavez and Maduro time before collapse. China eventually added conditions when Venezuela defaulted on the loans. China sold riot gear to the regimes.
Cuba was linked to Venezuela by an anti-American agenda. Oil moved from Venezuela to Cuba; soldiers, police officers, and security and intelligence experts moved from Cuba to Venezuela (to quell riots and demonstrations). Cuba taught Venezuela how to use food shortages to end dissent (think about it).
Turkey helped because of personal links between Erdogan and Maduro who were bonded by their dislike of democracy and its anti-corruption movements. Venezuela sent gold to Turkey in exchange for food.
Iran seemed the most improbable tie, Applebaum tells us. Oil binds them and anti-Americanism, opposition of democratic movements at home, trading information about how to evade sanctions. Iran got gold, Venezuela got food, gasoline and advice on the repression of dissidents. Iran helped Venezuela build a drone factory and sent money to be laundered for Hezbollah.
There are more examples in Chapter 2. More nations are involved. Applebaum says, “there are hybrid states that are a legitimate part of international financial systems, that normally trade with the democratic world, that are sometimes part of democratic military alliances but are also willing to launder or accept criminal or stolen wealth or to assist people and companies that have been sanctioned.” (p. 50)
My comments – Perhaps you have been very aware of the spread of autocracy and are not surprised by corruption, but it is important to note how autocratic nations are pitching in to get around sanctions that democracies use to try to enforce humanitarian standards both in peace and war. Will Autocracy Inc. become an institutionalized force against democracy instead of providing hit and run assistance to kleptocracies that go too far, whose economies fail, and who have sanctions against them? These nations deliberately try to exert power to prevent humanitarian reforms in the nations that may soon make up a true Autocracy Inc.
There are reasons why Anne Applebaum’s book Autocracy, Inc. is directly related to the 2024 election. Voters should always have access to issues that will affect their future as Americans. Sometimes there are issues that are flying under the radar, not being given the weight they should bear in our decision-making. Applebaum offers the details that show the roots of our autocratic tendencies. She ties togethers what seems like an economic wet dream with a flirtatious ideological invitation to keep the money train moving by voting. If Americans give Trump autocratic powers, he will guarantee that wealthy people will have pathways to stay wealthy (cutting taxes, cutting government, tariffs, favoritism). Those who support Trump in every way will be allowed to accumulate fortunes, as has been true for the oligarchs in autocratic states. Applebaum is asking us if we really want to give up our democracy so that rich people can turn the American economy into the Cayman Islands and the American government into Hungary (or Russia)? So, I am offering my version of Cliff Notes on Autocracy, Inc.
Anne Applebaum’s book Autocracy, Inc. is dense with statements of fact and proofs for those facts. Attempting to summarize and condense the contents is difficult. The ideas I am offering are not my own ideas. These are the arguments Anne Applebaum makes in her deceptively petite book. However, I do agree with her ideas and the details provided in her proofs make her commentary important. So, some of my summary will paraphrase the author and some will quote her directly. The contents of this book give us explanations for the rise of autocracies and show how America (and Great Britain) have become enmeshed in these kleptocratic practices. Applebaum is showing us our own drift towards autocracy and kleptocracy. Will abandoning human rights work to bring economic equality to all or to just a very few oligarchs? It’s an easy question to answer, but being able to get “down in the weeds” with cogent examples is the gift Anne Applebaum offers us. She has a team helping her with her research summarizing the content of many sources. She then passes what she has learned on to us.
How did America begin to adopt the practices of autocracies and kleptocracies?
“Western political leaders spoke about “democracy” and the “rule of law” in Russia, but Western companies were building autocracies and lawlessness and not only in Russia…By the time Putin became president, he was well acquainted with the double standards of Western democracies, which preached liberal values at home but were very happy to help build illiberal regimes everywhere else.” (p. 33)
Did we reap what we sowed?
Applebaum would say “yes,” I think. Her example takes us to Russia. Russia under Putin was designed to look like a democracy but look closer she suggests.
1. there were “no accidental winners” in Russian elections
2. everything was a front
3. banks that looked like banks were often money-laundering operations
4. “companies were sometimes facades” – what they offered were “ways for the very wealthy to siphon assets away from the state”
Many inhabitants of the Western world profited, ostensibly believing that Putin intended to democratize Russia.
Example: A steel plant in Warren, Ohio with a history of two explosions and many safety violations was shut down for good in January 2016. Kolomoisky (a Ukrainian oligarch from when the government followed the Russian model) owned the mill and hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of midwestern properties (“as part of a money-laundering operation connected to defrauding PrivatBank – a retail bank in Ukraine”).
“For decades, American real estate agents were not required to examine the source of their client’s funding.” It was okay to buy property anonymously (both in the US and in Europe). (p. 37)
Kolomoisky’s money from PrivatBank flowed through shell companies in Cyprus, the British Virgin Islands, and an American Branch of Deutsche Bank in Delaware.
Applebaum names some names:
Two Americans bought properties for Kolomoisky. Chaim Schochet of Miami and Mordechai Korf, a Miami businessman. Marc Kasowitz (who also represents Donald Trump) was their lawyer.
“These arrangements make no sense as business decisions,” says Applebaum, “but make plenty of sense in the arcane world of international kleptocracy.”
“In such a system, theft is rewarded, taxes are not paid, law enforcement is impotent and underfunded, and regulation is to be dodged,” she reminds us.
What we have learned.
Remember the revelations in the Pandora Papers (October 2021) from the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.
(Paraphrased) We have learned that financial traffic does not just go through the Caribbean — it also goes through the US and Great Britain. In the US, Delaware, Nevada, South Dakota and Wyoming are open for secretive financial operations.
Applebaum’s Conclusions in Chapter 1
“To stay in power, modern autocrats need to be able to take money and hide it without being bothered by political institutions that encourage transparency, accountability, or public debate.”
“Kleptocracy and autocracy go hand in hand, reinforcing each other but also undermining any other institution they touch. the real estate agents who don’t ask too many questions in Sussex or Hampshire, the factory owners eager to unload failing businesses in Warren, the bankers in Sioux Falls happy to accept mystery deposits from mystery clients — all of them undermine the rule of law in their own countries and around the world. The globalization of finance, the plethora of hiding places, and the benign tolerance that democracies have shown for foreign graft now give autocrats opportunities that few could have imagined a couple of decades ago. (p. 42)
Anne Applebaum is a reporter, an expert on Eastern Europe, Russia, China, Arabic nations and African nations. She is a Pulitzer Prize winner. Her newest book, Autocracy, Inc: The Dictators Who Want to Run the World, looks small but it’s an important manual describing the wheeling and dealing of autocrats both at home and abroad. This is a book that should be in your library if you believe that democracy, freedom, and human rights are worth fighting for. If you don’t think that there is a fight, read this book and it just might make you a believer. If you want to hear about strategies that could work in this fight they are on offer. It’s a war unlike the old Cold War we are familiar with. The dynamics are complex and the strategies change. Summarizing this book won’t work as it is a handbook and every word seems to carry weight. It is full of anecdotes that make concepts easy to understand and add value to the author’s arguments.
In the Introduction, Applebaum argues that it is greed that binds these autocrats, that their kleptocracy is metastasizing, that autocrats have learned how to control the narrative and change up the operating system (with a boost from tech advances) and that part of their plan involves smearing the Democrats. Action strategies are discussed in the Epilogue entitled Democrats United.
“Nowadays, autocracies are run not by one bad guy, but by sophisticated networks relying on kleptocratic financial structures, a complex of security systems-military, paramilitary, police-and technological experts who provide surveillance, propaganda, and disinformation.” (p. 1)
Members of Autocracy, Inc are connected within a given autocracy, but also with leaders in other autocratic countries, and sometimes with politicians in democracies too. These nations have different historical roots, goals and aesthetics, Applebaum tells us and then lists the nations:
China-Communism
Russia-Nationalism
Venezuela-Bolivarian socialism
North Korea-Juche
Islamic Republic of Iran-Shia radicalism
Monarchies: not as likely to seek to undermine the democratic world
Saudi Arabia
The Emirates
Vietnam
Softer autocracies (illiberal democracies)-choose allies based on expediency
Turkey
Singapore
India
Phillippines
Hungary
Other autocracies:
Nicaragua
Angola
Myanmar
Cuba
Syria
Zimbabwe
Belarus
Sudan
Azerbaijan
and 3 dozen others that are not named in the introduction.
Applebaum tells us that these nations do not act like a “bloc” but rather like “an agglomeration of companies bound not by ideology but rather a ruthless single-minded determination to preserve wealth and power). (which Applebaum and others call Autocracy, Inc.) (p. 4)
“They share a determination to deprive their citizens of any real influence or public voice, to push back against all forms of transparency or accountability, and to repress anyone, at home or abroad, who challenges them. (p. 3)
She tells us that their bonds are “cemented not through ideals, but through deals.” (p. 3)
Autocracy, Inc. nations collaborate to keep members in power and create a new world order (to replace the liberal world order). (p. 17)
“The autocracies believe they are winning. That belief-where it came from, why it persists, how the democratic world originally helped consolidate it, and how we can defeat it-is the subject of this book.) (p. 17)
It’s difficult to write about Applebaum’s book in my own words because she has done her due diligence, she is the expert we all need to consult, and every point she makes resonates if you have been watching and feeling anxious about the spread of autocracy. The book is full of anecdotes that we will recognize from news feeds although, perhaps, we were not able to put them into an organized framework to explain how powerful these concerted and often selfish efforts have been in creating changes in the world. If we don’t want to give up on the ideals of freedom of speech and freedom of thought and transparency; all the democratic principles we admire, then we will need better strategies to fight nations that do not mind fighting dirty. Demonstrations are not the best option. Applebaum explains why.
If you are an activist this is an important book to read and study. If you think governments are too corrupt and that you will ignore politics and live your life, you also need to read and study this book. Autocracy, Inc. is counting on ambivalence as an important weapon in this war on democracy.
Michael Lewis’ book The Fifth Risk is nonfiction. It examines what happened in several government agencies when Trump won the 2016 election. Presidents usually put their own people in as heads of our government agencies, and they tend to do it quickly and strategically. A team is generally sent in to make a smooth transition in services that benefit key groups which in turn benefit American citizens.
When Trump took office several department/agencies saw no transition team arrive and if a new head of agency had been appointed, they tended to arrive alone and late and to ignore the transition materials prepared by outgoing staff.
By now Americans have heard plenty about the Heritage Foundation’s agenda for the RNC if Trump wins in 2024 in the nearly 1000-page Project 2025 pdf. Lewis in his book The Fifth Risk takes a deep dive on a few areas where Republicans already showed us what changes they plan to make in programs that Americans rely on, programs that Republicans want to shut down. Trump, in his first term as President, tended to replace career people who were experts in their fields with loyalists who planned to deconstruct the departments they led.
One of these departments was the Department of Energy. Trump and Republicans are climate deniers. They do not want to implement alternative energies; they would rather rely even more heavily on fossil fuels. Employees in the Department of Energy expected people to be sent by the new administration to the department for the transition. They had all the transition notebooks ready to bring the new staff up to date on things like how to stop a virus, how to take a census, how to tell if a foreign nation has nuclear capability. No one showed. A man named Pyle finally showed up but would not listen to experts in the department. He suggested weekly meetings but never attended them. He sent a list of 24 questions which asked for lists of attendees to energy meetings. All DOE scientific experts were told to leave despite the need for national nuclear security.
Chapter II tells the story of Ali Zaidis whose parents moved him from Karachi to a small American town with no Muslims. Ali became a Republican until he traveled with the America’s Promise Board to help in New Orleans after Katrina. He was shocked by the poverty he saw. He asked himself how anyone could “lift themselves up by their own bootstraps” when there were no bootstraps. This question also came up – “If you’re a store owner after a weather crisis, should you hike up the cost of flashlights.” Members of the Republican Club said yes. Ali said no. So, Ali joined the Obama campaign and took a job at the White House. He was using data from the Department of Agriculture. It was a month before anyone showed up in 2016 from the Trump administration. The appointee was a hunter and gun enthusiast. He wanted a list of employees who worked on climate change. The Trump administration sent in employees with little or no agriculture experience and everyone was instructed not to say “climate change”. Sonny Purdue finally arrived in April.
The USDA had a particularly complicated budget. They oversaw food services and school lunch programs and WIC. Trump cut food stamps over 25%. People are convinced that food stamp recipients buy things that are not acceptable and sell their food stamps for cash. Since the EBT cards were put into use cheating was rare. Hungry people are not always fed. The states get the money, but they don’t have to use it to feed people. “We are proud to do the absolute minimum,” said one state leader. I haven’t told you all the sad anecdotes. It’s the Department of Agriculture after all and we haven’t even talked about farms yet. Changes in ag-science drive changes in society.
The third department discussed by Lewis is the department that keeps track of the weather. Before the technology developed and computers were able to handle complex data, there was very little data available about the weather. After a deadly hurricane hit Joplin, Missouri it was noted that tornado warnings often came too late. We have seen the improvement in weather data since early days. When the Trump team came in to the agency employees were not allowed to say the word “tornado”, because I guess if you don’t say it then it won’t happen? (Ridiculous) Since the arrival of weather channels like AccuWeather people tend to think that their weather reports come from private endeavors, and they don’t realize the role of government and science in supporting the collection of weather data. Republicans want to stop sending out weather data for free and to sell it to private enterprises that will then sell it to us.
Although this book is about the first Trump administration the author warns us of what might happen in a second Trump term. Michael Lewis covers information that many citizens don’t have access to in his book The Fifth Risk. Be informed.
From a Google Image Search – West Vancouver Memorial Library
The movie is streaming online, and I am just getting around to reading Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI by David Grann. This is not a literary book. Indeed, it’s a bit dry in style and involves many names, mostly of men. And not for the most part good men. However, the content is anything but dry; it’s still shocking even if you believe that recent events have made you unshockable.
The story begins with the Osage Indians, continues with oil and gas discoveries, and ends with plots, murders, greed, theft, and the formation of the modern FBI under J. Edgar Hoover. The US government had treaties with indigenous people which they frequently ignored. That’s how the Osage tribe ended up far away from Kansas and found themselves in Oklahoma. (Next stop Pacific Ocean?) Each family was given allotments of land that depended on the size of the family. When oil and gas were discovered, it turned out that the Osage did not own their allotments, but they owned the mineral rights under them. Each member of the family was given a “headright” to profits from any wells on his/her property.
Although the Osage had those headrights, the government (in its infinite wisdom) sought to “protect” the naïve owners of these headrights. They assigned white folks to act as guardians. That, rather than offering protection, opened the door to human predators who had no moral boundaries. The greedy guys did not even stop at killing someone or paying someone to do it for them. To make sure the headrights came to a white person, marriage was required.
The story begins when two members of the tribe have been killed by a bullet in the back of the head. Charles Whithorn had been missing for a while and Annie Brown’s body was found quickly due to pressure from Annie’s sister Molly. Annie and Molly were quite different. Annie liked to party and so she was given short shrift by the authorities, her life undervalued and disrespected. Molly lost her sister Minnie who seemed to get progressively sicker for no discernible reason, as did Mollie’s mother Lizzie. For the time being, Mollie’s married sister Rita seemed fine. Mollie was married to Ernest Burkhart, a white man. He was related to William Hale, a man who seemed overly present in the lives of certain members of the Osage.
The machinations of bad actors are what makes this tale both shocking and engrossing. Can you guess which characters are the slimiest? Remember, these are all real people.
Some books get under our skin, and we credit the author for being such a spellbinding writer. We become a fan, and we want to read every book that author has written and any future books s/he writes. That is what happened to my friend when he read Revolution Song: The Story of American Freedom by Russell Shorto. He was so excited that I agreed to read Shorto’s book. Not long ago I read George Washington: A Life by Ron Chernow so I expected that I would just find Shorto covering familiar ground. But the Chernow book was published in 2011 and Shorto’s book was published in 2018. The latter book is informed by a whole lot of recent political scrutiny.
Shorto’s history does not just cover the role of George Washington in the American founding. He invites some less well-known Americans into the mix (along with a few Brits and Washington’s great friend, Lafayette, a Frenchman).
We follow a slave stolen from his native land and brought to America, going by his slave’s name, Venture until he finds his way to freedom, the raison d’etre for the Revolutionary War and a common thread among the characters in Shorto’s book. It is a long time before most African Americans achieve freedom.
We follow a Native American, member of the Six Nations, Cornplanter, who treats with leaders who are French, British, and American and who temporarily finds his little piece of freedom.
Margaret Coghlan stands in for all the women whose freedom was ignored in this war for freedom and individual liberty.
“Margaret Coghlan felt this pull of freedom that was in the air in the eighteenth century, but she realized, too late, that it did not apply to half of the human race. History does not record what became of Coghlan’s children, the poor waifs she dragged around with her as her tragic life wound down, but her ideological descendants span the history of the women’s movement, from Elizabeth Cady Stanton to Gloria Steinem, and for that matter includes people like Amelia Earhart, Ellen DeGeneres and every woman who broke a gender barrier.” (p. 506)
Abraham Yates was a conservative who felt that America should be a loose affiliation of states without a strong federal government. He began with almost nothing and had to work very hard to win whatever personal power he could fight his way in society for. He eventually became a lawyer and then a public servant and he had gathered enough clout to be included in the Constitution Convention to rewrite the Articles of Confederation. He had better reasons to back state’s rights than slave owners had but George Washington and his rival Alexander Hamilton favored a strong central government, taxation, and a federal bank. Yates was able to force the inclusion of the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution
Our founders saw the mismatch between promising to honor the belief that “all men are created equal” and the belief of many slave owners that slavery was necessary for the economy and that black men were savages and therefore not equal to white men. No one even considered for a minute the rights of women. They worried that this philosophical lie that lay at the heart of our government would one day destroy the nation.
“At the outset of the war they had gotten a proper scare when news reached them that hundreds of slaves in Jamaica had attempted an uprising. Even more troubling, the Jamaican slaves had apparently been inspired by the very ideals of freedom that Washington and his fellow rebels proclaimed. The Jamaican rebellion had been crushed, its leaders executed and either burned alive or had their bodies displayed as a public warning. For a man like Washington, the affair underscored the dangerous double-edged nature of the ideology the Americans espoused. Uprisings were a nightmare that all southern slaveholding families lived with. To give weapons to people they had been systematically abusing for generations was beyond his comprehension. Freedom was what Washington was fighting for, but not for them. Not now. It was an irony, an incongruity, a flaw in the American project of bringing true individual liberty into being: he did not deny that. But he couldn’t solve it. He was not a philosopher. (p. 352)
We are still dealing with the aftermath of this founding dilemma, and it seems to be tearing the nation apart even though slavery is no longer legal. Racism, the news shows us, is still alive and well in America to our shame and it may yet end our long flirtation with liberty.
Washington was also conflicted about whether America should have a strong central government or give autonomy to the several states. We are still fighting about which of these governmental designs would offer the most freedom and individual liberty. Washington chose to use his reputation and fame to back a strong central government, but he was not at all sure that it was the correct choice.
“In June, Washington wrote a circular letter “to the army,” but really to the leadership of the state governments. He had spent the entire war enraged at Congress’s mismanagement of finances and the underfunding of the army. There had been a power vacuum in the American government throughout the war; now it threatened to open into a chasm. In the letter, he expressed his happy astonishment that what they had fought for had actually been achieved: that Americans were now “possessed of absolute freedom and Independency.” But he stressed that the structure for maintaining that freedom was lacking. Taking his cues from Madison and Hamilton he suggested that what was needed was “an indissoluble union of states under one Federal Head.” This required that the individual states “suffer Congress” to exercise authority. Without this “everything must rapidly tend to Anarchy and confusion.” (p. 402)
Washington shows his prescience when, as the author reports, he says,
“Sounding much like Yates, Washington said he now saw that periods of turbulence would “gradually incline the minds of men to seek security & repose in the absolute power of an Individual and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation on the ruins of Public Liberty.”
My friend was right. Russell Shorto nonfiction book was a worthwhile addition to books that cover the era of the American Revolution, and it is important because it discusses the challenges we face right now as we decide anew whether to choose freedom, even if it is only relative freedom, over autocratic rule. (Even those unusual characters in Shorto’s book are real people and there were documents telling the stories of their lives, with attributions given in the end notes.)
[John McHenry’s journal echoes Washington’s statement, “A Republic, if they can keep it.”]
So Many Books, Choose Wisely 